How to Convert a CNC Part to MIM: A Step-by-Step Guide

Reducing per-part cost by converting from CNC machining to MIM is one of the most common engineering cost-reduction initiatives. But the conversion requires more than just sending the same drawing to a MIM manufacturer — the design must be re-optimized for the MIM process.

The 5-step conversion process: Step 1 — Geometry screening

Not every CNC part is a candidate. A good MIM conversion candidate has:

  • Weight under 50 g (ideally under 20 g)
  • Maximum dimension under 50 mm
  • Annual volume above 5,000-10,000 parts
  • Complex 3D geometry that currently requires multiple machining operations
Step 2 — Tolerance relaxation

CNC parts are often over-toleranced for MIM. Review every dimension:

CNC Tolerance Suggested MIM Tolerance Savings Opportunity
±0.013 mm ±0.05 mm (IT9) Any tight dimension that can be relaxed reduces cost
±0.025 mm ±0.10 mm (IT10) Major cost driver — relax if function allows
±0.05 mm on 3+ features Keep 1-2 critical; relax rest 30-50% cost reduction
Step 3 — Material review

  • If the original material is 316L or 17-4PH: direct replacement, no change needed
  • If the original is 303 stainless: switch to 316L (303 is not MIM-compatible)
  • If the original is aluminum: cannot MIM directly — consider MIM stainless as a replacement or keep the part as CNC/die cast aluminum
  • If the original is titanium: MIM Ti6Al4V is feasible at sufficient volume
Step 4 — DFM adjustments for MIM
  • Add draft angles (0.5-1.0° minimum) to vertical surfaces
  • Increase internal radii (R ≥ 0.3 mm)
  • Add uniform wall thickness or core out thick sections
  • Orient holes parallel to mold opening to avoid side actions
Step 5 — Cost projection
Annual Volume CNC Cost (10 g, 316L, complex) MIM Cost (converted) Savings
5,000 $8-18 $3-6 50-65%
20,000 $7-16 $1.50-3.00 65-80%
50,000 $6-15 $0.80-1.80 70-85%
Quick Q: How much can I save converting from CNC to MIM?

For complex parts under 20 g at volumes above 10,000/year, expect 50-80% cost reduction. The largest savings come from eliminating material waste (MIM uses >95% of input material vs 15-40% for CNC) and consolidating multiple machining operations into a single molding step.

ATMIK provides a free CNC-to-MIM conversion feasibility analysis — send your current CNC part drawing and annual volume for a side-by-side cost comparison.

Contents

Contact: Cindy