Investment Casting vs MIM: Quick Comparison Guide

Investment casting and MIM are both near-net-shape processes for complex metal parts. The choice is primarily driven by part size, volume, and required precision.

Head-to-head comparison:
Factor Investment Casting MIM
Part size range 1 g - 25 kg+ 0.1 - 50 g
Typical volume 100-10,000 parts/run 5,000-500,000+/yr
Tolerance (as-processed) ±0.5% of dimension ±0.3% of dimension
Surface finish Ra 3.2-6.3 µm Ra 1.6-3.2 µm
Tooling cost $3k-15k (wax die) $5k-30k (steel mold)
Tooling lead time 4-8 weeks 6-14 weeks
Per-part cost (10 g, 5,000/yr) $1.50-3.00 $3-6
Per-part cost (10 g, 50,000/yr) $0.80-1.50 $0.50-1.20
Material options Very wide (Al, Cu, steel, superalloys, Ti) Wide (stainless, steel, Ti, Inconel, Cu)
Process speed (first article) 6-10 weeks 10-16 weeks
Quick summary:
  • Choose investment casting when: parts are larger than 50 g, volumes below 10,000/year, material is aluminum or copper, or the part requires non-ferrous alloys that MIM cannot process
  • Choose MIM when: parts are under 20 g, volumes exceed 20,000/year, tight tolerances (±0.3%) are required, or thin walls (under 1 mm) are needed
ATMIK offers both investment casting and MIM capabilities — allowing unbiased process selection based on part requirements.

Contents

Contact: Cindy