One of the most visible differences between MIM parts and conventional PM parts is geometric complexity. MIM parts can have undercuts, side holes, threads, and complex 3D contours. PM parts are limited to pressable shapes that can be ejected from a single-axis die. Why?
The fundamental difference:| Factor | MIM | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Material state | Fluid (feedstock heated to 150-200°C) | Dry powder at room temperature |
| How shape is formed | Injected into a closed mold cavity | Compressed between upper and lower punches in a die |
| Part removal | Mold opens; core pulls and slides retract; part ejected | Die opens; lower punch pushes part out of die cavity |
| Side features | Formed by slides that retract before ejection | Not possible — the die cavity must be a straight-walled tube |
| Feature | MIM | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Side hole perpendicular to mold opening | Yes (slide/core pull) | No |
| Undercut on external surface | Yes (slide) | No |
| Internal thread | No (must be post-machined) | No |
| Variable wall thickness | Yes | Limited |
| Thin wall (<0.5 mm) | Yes | No (minimum 1.5-2.0 mm) |
| Gear tooth profile | Yes | Yes (if parallel to press direction) |
MIM uses a multi-component mold with retractable slides and core pulls that can form undercuts, side holes, and 3D contours, then withdraw before ejection. PM uses a simple die cavity with only vertical punch motion — any feature that prevents the part from being pushed straight out of the die is impossible. This is why MIM is chosen for geometrically complex parts and PM for simple pressable shapes.